top of page
Constatine-belfry-june26 17B copy.jpg

Anita Vadgama

Anita is widely recognised for her employment law practice, particularly in disability discrimination and Group Income Protection (GIP) benefits. Chambers and Partners 2024 notes that she is “an expert in discrimination” with notable experience advising clients dealing with mental health issues.

Position

Partner

  • Linkedin
Catherine Wilson Legal 500 recommended lawyer
Vadgama, Anita.jpg

Anita is a senior discrimination lawyer who acts predominantly for claimants and senior executives, including C-suite employees. Her practice focuses on three core areas: discrimination claims, with particular expertise in disability, neurodiversity, sex and race discrimination, and harassment, especially for senior BAME women; whistleblowing claims, acting for claimants who have been penalised or dismissed for making protected disclosures; and GIP benefits, advising on applications, drafting appeals to insurers and the Financial Ombudsman Service, and negotiating enhanced commuted lump-sum settlements in lieu of benefits.

 

In a previous role at a boutique specialist employment practice, Anita served as Head of Litigation. She has successfully represented clients in the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal, securing judgments for numerous claimants and negotiating high-value settlements both before and during hearings. In one recent case, she succeeded in a disability discrimination claim subsequently brought on behalf of the estate of a claimant who sadly passed away from cancer before judgment was handed down.

 

Anita also regularly advises senior executives on significant termination packages, including short- and long-term incentive arrangements. She has experience advising on FCA regulatory references and related regulatory matters and is ranked by both Chambers & Partners and The Legal 500 for her work advising senior executive employees.

 

Earlier in her career, Anita acted for claimants at a large trade union law firm before relocating to the United States for seven years. There, she practised as a dual-qualified English and Massachusetts attorney at Littler Mendelson, the world’s largest employment and labour law firm. Most recently, she spent eight years as a partner and Head of Litigation at a ranked employment practice.

Reported cases:

Marlow v East Thames Housing Group Limited [2002] IRLR 798 which held that employers must take all reasonable steps to procure GIP benefits for their employees.

Brunel University & another v Vaseghi & another UKEAT 0307/06/1610 which held that in discrimination case the need to get to the truth may tip the scales against the privilege afforded to “without prejudice” communications.

Barrow v Kellogg Brown & Root (UK) Ltd (2001), where the ET ordered £2.5 million in damages for disability discrimination claim, the third highest UK award for disability discrimination at the time.

Kong v Gulf International Bank (UK) Limited [2022] EWCA Civ 941, where the Court of Appeal upheld that a protected disclosure was properly separatable from the employee’s conduct surrounding the disclosure.

Clifford v IBM United Kingdom Ltd [2024] EAT 90 where the EAT held that the ET was correct to strike out a claimant’s claims for disability discrimination because they had been precluded by a settlement agreement.

 

LAWYER, US LAW FIRM BASED IN LONDON

“You were strategic, calm, and a brilliant negotiator throughout and the whole process move far more swiftly than I had any right to expect. Honestly, I rarely hear of good experiences from people who have had to engage legal counsel in this kind of situation, which is why I want you to know I will be recommending you wholeheartedly to anyone I come across in a similar position.”
bottom of page